Change perpendicular-distance constraint to something more intuitive to setting parallel distance (#110)
* some clean up * Change perpendicular-distance constraint to something more intuitive to setting parallel distance * delete * add back * force rename * change name back * try renaming again
This commit is contained in:
@ -386,7 +386,7 @@ show(part001)`
|
||||
const { __geoMeta, ...segment } = getSketchSegmentFromSourceRange(
|
||||
programMemory.root['part001'] as SketchGroup,
|
||||
[index, index]
|
||||
)
|
||||
).segment
|
||||
expect(segment).toEqual({
|
||||
type: 'toPoint',
|
||||
to: [5.62, 1.79],
|
||||
@ -399,7 +399,7 @@ show(part001)`
|
||||
const { __geoMeta, ...segment } = getSketchSegmentFromSourceRange(
|
||||
programMemory.root['part001'] as SketchGroup,
|
||||
[index, index]
|
||||
)
|
||||
).segment
|
||||
expect(segment).toEqual({ type: 'base', to: [0, 0.04], from: [0, 0.04] })
|
||||
})
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
Reference in New Issue
Block a user